![]() centered, extremely detailed, Nikon D850, award-winning photography. ![]() by Dan Winters, Russell James, Steve McCurry. Prompt: a film photo of (tom hanks), (wearing a tuxedo), in a field of corn stalks, detailed eyes, masculine pose, sharp focus, handsome, ((looking at me)), (Detailed Pupils), atmospheric lighting, cinematic composition, photograph, depth of field, bokeh, moody light, golden hour. Run that prompt at 20 steps to find a good seed (I usually batch about 12+ images) when you find the seed you want run an xy with steps like this:Īs you can see there's no issue with higher steps in the ancestral sampler, you're just not being specific with the promptīefore anyone asks here's the prompt (makes great photography) ![]() Unlike others here I've had great success with higher steps, but your prompt has to be rock solid, this is my workflowĬreate a great prompt (which means also using negative prompting, and not JUST "ugly, extra limbs" but dialing in positives with negatives ie: for a photograph: cartoon, 3d, painting, render, octane, drawing etc to guarantee the result is more "photo") The difference with the ancestral sampling is that it generates more variation faster. I guess I've just been lead to believe that Euler a always does really weird bizarre stuff.Įuler A only gives weird bizarre stuff when you're not configuring it properly. I'm surprised this beauty came from Euler a.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |